FREMANTLE LIGHTRAIL NOT A PIPE DREAM, it could be a nightmare for locals residents and businesses

Will this be a bigger impact on the fremantle community, than roe 9 tunnel??????????

Fremantle residents need to ensure they ask Fremantle council the right questions with our politically motivated ideological driven council on the drive for their latest scenario.

This would appear to make Fremantle Councils light rail more destructive to Fremantle than the Roe 9 tunnel.  All the verge trees and many in peoples front yards would need to be cut down, or cleared to make way for Rachel’s Pemberton’s Light Rail Future.

  • How many families would have their  homes on South St impacted?
  • How many businesses would need to knocked down to make way for the new rail line?
  • How much of their blocks will be reclaimed for the new verges area?
  • All the big pine trees on South St before Carrington St would need to go.
  • About 80 trees between Carrington St and Stock St would need to go.
  • The impact east of Stock Rd could also be huge if over head power is needed, with many old large trees could over hang the power system.
  • How will this effect the value of all homes along South St especially those close to road with added rail noise and vibration. Wheel squeal and flanging noise are often causes of annoyance to residents as the high pitch screeching is mainly found at the high frequency end of the human audible noise spectrum?
  • Now its been made so public will real estate agents now have to warn prospective buyers of the developments the council is driving for.
  • Now the Councillor has come out and spoken about it so publicly, what impact could this have on Trans Perth not prioritizing new bus routes or possible rapid bus transit lanes, which TP development speaks of?
  • The months of turmoil on people and businesses while South St is dug up and the new infrastructure is put in place?
  • Worse, no road reserve is noted for the final leg to Fremantle, so who’s street could it drive through and what is the impact on loss of homes and businesses to for fill their ideology? Leaving years of uncertainly for local families
  • This is just the start of the questions of the impact that such a project could have.
  • Will council make this projects impact clear to all residents and businesses impacted by their new rail line before the next election, or will this get another dose of spin, smoke and mirrors.
  • Would Roe 9 have removed many vehicles off south st if council had engaged in a positive contribution to this project instead of the negative one
  • Is this just another council drive to lift the R zoning, killing off our urban canopy and adding to their anti-car campaign.

The devastation on an old established suburb will be huge by driving a light rail system through these old heritage area.

Peter Goodes Who pays for the infrastructure! Seriously!
LikeShow More Reactions

Reply

1

7 hrs

Remove

Mayor Brad Pettitt Part of it will be value capture
LikeShow More Reactions

Reply7 hrs

Peter Goodes Mayor Brad Pettitt that’s a nice way to put it Brad. I think light rail is great. I could never understand why Fremantle and southern areas didnt have greater access to public rail. However, it is interesting how over the last 40 yrs this state has sysSee more
LikeShow More Reactions

Reply7 hrsEdited

Remove

the community needs straight answers not spin like “valuue capture”, give clear answers, not verbal d,,,,,

Some other links to the issue

FREMANTLE LIGHTRAIL NOT A PIPE DREAM

Light rail on track for Perth’s south, with route from Murdoch to Fremantle mooted

 

 

 

 

Fremantle Council Shambles Continue

shambles

Amazing our council seems to know how to consistently make contracts that actually screw up the cities ability to move forward.

Council has made lemons out of deal after deal.

Kings Square business plan has kept the CBD dead (apart from the drunks, dregs and druggies) for over 3yrs now, first they screwed up by letting Myers leave then the Mayor, Brad Pettitts clanger of a Kings Square Business Plan.

He was warned by an ex mayor don’t do it, professional staff (that left) said the same. Members of the Community tried to raise questions, but where publicly vilified for it. Fremantle Society raised questions never got answers, several community groups fared no better. a Politician asked questions in Parliament the Minister pretty much ignored them. Financial specialists, with a puissance for this sort of financial application, have raised serious questions in the both the outcome and methodology of the so call business plan. Councillors have been written too as individuals asking direct questions of the procedure and their understanding of the outcome and their responsibilities in this chain of council decisions, that started back in 2012.

All this and they blissfully carried on with our piped piper leading them down the path, the only councillor who showed an ounce of free will was ex councillor Bill Massie and his replacement since. All of this leading to a possible $50,000,000.00 loss for the ratepayers.

Then the shocker of deal with the Dockers, leaving the council with a vacating footie team who has the ground locked  for peanuts, for decades, our councillors showing yet again their financial acumen. Rate payers screwed yet again.

Giving away the Esplanade for next to free for a select group. Another bill for the rate payers to cover.

Anyone wondering why we see our rates rise the way they do????

Then we see another couple of sweet deals for the a couple of groups at the old naval stores, somehow this group get an amazingly cheap deal and have the ability to sublease out space to profit on something they are killing time with. How this is a positive outcome for Freo is beyond me.

Then we come round to a deal which seems to have been a pet project for the mayor as he rode it pretty hard. Including a more than smoke screen of a farce community engagement, which went 180 degrees opposite to what the community groups came up with. Again community groups raised a whole range of objections, now seemingly mostly if not all justified, as the Mayor and co, completely ignored community objections and concerns and just did want they felt like.

So what we have again is another divide in our community, modeled by council and another part of our town left de-activated; this time for how long as we wait to see how our our council sorts another self made mess.

How many different spaces in the Queensgate centre are being used by groups who are paying well below market rate if anything at all, who are they and what connections do they have to our current council? What else is the rate payer funding, that they have no idea about.

The WAPC  finding a pretty much given for Freo,

  • Use of land reserved for parks & recreation, regional open space was not as specified and the plan Brad drove so hard for did not comply with intended use of such a reserve, oh yes the community did raise that, another thing he ignored.
  • Wait for it; the proposal did not have sufficient car-parking, right how many times was that mentioned? that’s pretty much a staple for our anti-car council.
  • Didn’t comply with the local planning for Fremantle
  • Had a negative impact on local residences and other businesses.
  • Didn’t comply with the COF own West-end policy.
  • They missed, it went against COF own Alcohol policy
  • There is a few more apart from their other stupid ideas, of using whalers tunnel, or the bike path to set up the events if FPA blocked use of the road.
  • Not to mention pissing off the local business and pretty much looked they were trying to drive them out?
  • FPA against the  proposal
  • Setting up a massive booze barn across from a TAFE.
  • It just goes on and on.

Even better when we see the WAPC ruling coming out, wheres our Mayor, oh yes off jet-setting overseas, increasing his carbon-footprint and now the proverbial is going down in freo, over councils latest cock-up, he’s off on his Holidays, leadership at its most. Possible a good plan overseas, let the heat die down, and hold another love in about small apartments that heat off their own poo.

So we see Roel ( J SHED INCOMPETENCE A WORRY FOR KINGS SQUARE ) coming out all guns blazing on the professional staff and fair enough, how did they let all that go by? Still he did not once call to account our Mayor or Councillors, whom were the ones to finally vote to allow this debacle to happen in the 1st place. Hes not publishing any council facts/critics now days, so another place council gets a walk.

I would ask another question, is this professional body that incompetent or is it a group that is ridden rough shot over and told what to do or what outcomes will be, to suit a certain person and his personal agenda?

Isn’t this why the final decisions rests with people who are so called representatives of the city residents and ratepayers or electors, our councillors and Mayor right, isn’t this what they get paid for ?

In these cases you have to ask who’s best interests were they taking care of, from the outcomes so far it doesn’t look like the old electors are faring to well?

It was great to see the CCC’s recommendation for the Auditor general office to get some oversite of local council.

Its fair to say many in the freo community would be happy to see the auditors general popping into freo any day real soon.

 

Keep

calm

its

a

shambles.

We cant we want to live here!

Its a horror movie

Another Blow to Freo; Murdoch precinct land released | Fremantle Herald Interactive

WITH an eye on Murdoch becoming a “new city centre”, LandCorp is releasing seven large development lots for office, retail and 400 new residences. The lots, ranging between 2000sqm and 6000sqm, wil…

Source: Murdoch precinct land released | Fremantle Herald Interactive

development-497640_960_720

What freo councils not good at

Looks like Freo has another blow heading its way if this development takes off.

Easy access to Freeways north and south, Roe Hwy going east. Only congestion going thru or towards Freo.

Naturally council with its mainstream political leaning to labor and the greens direction has blocked  Roe 8 or PFL development. Allowing another newly developing suburb to benefit from easy access to the wider Perth metro network; while Freo languishes in its current dangerous  and  congested streets.

Fremantle Council (COF) blocking such basic infrastructure is ensuring Fremantle is not a designation for many travellers. Why bother with the traffic? Soon we will see Booragoon double in size. Strangely no doubling in residences in the area, it turns out people want to go to buy what that centre offers. Opposed to freo councils plan, is to build in what people don’t want, and cancel things they enjoy look the Australian Day fireworks and parking.

We here constantly dribble online about sterile shopping centres and how bad they are, but that seems to be what the vastly broader community wants, that’s why they are full and freo has the revolving door of retailers.

Now we see east of Freo a new development

“LandCorp is releasing seven large development lots for office, retail and 400 new residences.

The precinct is the first stage of the broader Murdoch Activity Centre, which is expected to provide 35,000 jobs, educational facilities for 44,000 students, and homes for 22,000 people.”

22,000 residence thats about 2/3 of Freo’s current population.

This attractive location and its easy access to  a good road network will be another blow for poor old freo.

 

Is this to be Fremantle’s Future under its current council?

4660120_fe516ac0-freos-future-under-council

Where Freo Council is taking our poor city

Apartments, Market Price Shock is it Coming to Freo?

We see lots of development in Freo planned, a lot being driven by policy shifts by council to fulfill their socialists political agendas.

SEINFELD -- "The Frogger" Episode 18 -- Pictured: (l-r) Julia Louis-Dreyfus as Elaine Marie Benes, Jerry Seinfeld as Jerry Seinfeld, Michael Richards as Cosmo Kramer (Photo by Joey Delvalle/NBC/NBCU Photo Bank via Getty Images)

Caution needed in Freo for investment especially with current council, running down Brand Freo, while driving political agenda

We have seen the granny flat move from just that, to these ugly, unsafe container development in our suburbs. Also bringing  with it the 1/2 way house style housing, which will impact the regular housing value in the future, especially with what we see the industry predicting .

FROM GARDEN SUBURB TO GHETTO

HUGE URBAN DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL FOR FREMANTLE | Freo’s View

“Fremantle already has a higher than average % of homes west than the average suburb and needs no more. Just 2 weeks ago we see cars torched at the cold store area as drug dealing issues come to the front in homes west houses again.”

Australian-attached-house-prices-Q1-2016

The worst is yet to come?

We see council policy pushing for smaller houses, no car parking etc, so when different entities try to manipulate the markets and drive it in a direction the natural capital market would take we see people getting badly caught out. This is a perfect way to build the slums of the future.

We see predictions of 20% drops in value of such developments, meaning people would walk away from deposits and leaving the developer to resell in a crashing market.

Where  we see regular traditional housing prices preforming better and the rural and outer suburbs and developments out preforming the metro areas.

Trying to drive cheap housing into areas with expensive real estate is counter productive, as it will impact the higher net worth properties too.

Council is scared of the market becoming to upmarket as this will kill off their voting base. easy to see their main concern, their own survival?

So we see infill, destruction of our urban canopy what looks like council trying to keep a centralized  voting base, by wrecking what makes our suburbs great.

Sadly the average home owner will only take notice, of the political agenda our council in Freo is running to late; based around the socialist agenda driven by groups like the UN. Who want to dictate to us how we live, where and with whom. Council plans to limit how many cars a family can own. Limit the ratio of the house size you can live in to the land you have to build on. It will not be hard to see why  Fremantle properties  could be hit hard, based on the low level of facilities/options Freo properties will have to offer, thanks to council, when compared to others.

Freo council seems good at working for very small groups, special interests, general supporters I imagine but broadly not so even good  at they poorly engage, the broader public.

Councils driving this small apartments and density it looks like this segment is about to get smashed lets hope, not to many lose their shirts in this crash. One thing for sure I wouldn’t be taking any investment or lifestyle advice from this crowd as, I don’t see many of them living the way the preach others should.

If this is style of development is acceptable to Freo council what else will they do to our suburbs, what will happen to  the most substantial investment most of us will make in yourh lives, what will it be worth after Freo Council is finished downgrading your suburb?

Freo Dongers

Freo’s future?

 

CITI: Where Australia’s apartment boom could unwind

CLSA: Australia’s housing market has peaked

Some win, some lose in Australia’s big apartment crunch

Interest rate rises could smash apartment market by 20 per cent: AMP Capital

WA Excerpt From The 2016 August Market Report

 

Greens for trees | Fremantle Herald Interactive, But their actions tell another story

THE Greens are promising to double Fremantle’s tree canopy by 2040 under an “urban forest” plan. Freo council has already adopted a policy to increase the dire coverage of trees over barren streets…

Source: Greens for trees | Fremantle Herald Interactive

Where’s the Trees, where’s the Green?

 

Words are one thing all politicians are good at, action is another thing completely.

The Fremantle Council has a few greens on it and currently Fremantle has the 2nd worst hard surface amount in WA, according to the 202020, report.

Since that report was done we have seen the Esplanade Concreted over, worsening that particular situation.

We have seen the majority of these councilors; approve a plan that cut down 100+ mature trees in White Gum Valley on the Old Kim Beazley site.

They also did not demand that the developer give the necessary 10% additional open public space as is normal with these developments, instead allowed them to use the public space that was already there. So the developer could get in more small blocks adding more concrete and hard surface covering.

Then we see the Burt St development went down a similar path with council again not stipulating the required 10% open public space, again allowing more concrete more hard surface covering.

We see this council with all these Fremantle council members most of houses, driving for smaller and small blocks, higher R-codes, high density, more med high rise development, which leads to more and more trees being cut down.

Again we see the Concrete from our green council pouring into our parks so they build basketballs on park land which Fremantle already in short supply.

Most councils in the world supply similar services to their residents, sporting areas are great. What most councils with an ounce of common sense do is invest that money into areas that are run down or poorly utilized, in disrepair etc, to build these public services. Not Fremantle council they go straight for the park land and trees, pouring in the concrete.

Then we see more concrete coming down a Port beach with the new flow rider system, more open land for concrete.

We see in a report last year that over 90% of new trees planted by councils don’t make, so for even the ones that do we have to wait 2 decades to see some benefit from them. You think that would make the existing trees even more precious, well I guess not for Freo council.

So when they say they will improve the tree canopy to double by 2040, I see they didn’t make a note of what the coverage is presently, so we are clear from what point we are starting from. Otherwise just expect more of our Mayors unique smoke and mirrors, slide of hand. Also not clarified is whether, Fremantle’s means the CBD, the greater city of Fremantle, the State Electoral boundaries, or the Federal election boundaries

We have many of these councilors and mayor for a decade now, yet still our tree canopy shrinks.

So with it taking at least 20 yrs. to get a tree and its canopy established , all going well, that means  for the Greens to succeed they would have to double all the trees currently in Fremantle, have them all survive and grow above the roof line of houses to be considered a canopy.

That’s a bit hard when the greens on council are hell bent on density, which now is just clearing blocks removing everything just to squeeze as many dwellings as possible.

Then we have the Councils drive for urban rail and the route the Mayor and his team are taking that will be hundred’s more trees cut down to facilitate that.

Then we have the ever increasing amount of containers coming from the Fremantle port even if the Outer Harbour is built, and of course our council has objected to that too. Instead building the massive Lat 32 which adds 140 km2’s of hard coverage to Cockburn and destroying any tree canopy there too. So it’s hard to see how they will double tree canopy when the Fremantle Council supported policy is to build the biggest industrial park in Australia.

So actions speaking louder than words, it’s a fairly pie in the sky promise, which should have its intended action of rallying a few voters for the green cause and have its disciples sprouting the virtues of the Green Dogma, while its agents at Council, keep driving up the R-zoning clearing more trees, and laying more concrete. Going in the opposite direction of the said promise, only to blame, capitalists, Tony Abbott or conservatives about the evil ways when in fact it looks like the greens are just showing their hypocrisy yet again.

What is Urban Tree Canopy?

Urban tree canopy (UTC) is the layer of leaves, branches, and stems of trees that cover the ground when viewed from above. In urban areas, the UTC provides an important storm water management function by intercepting rainfall that would otherwise run off of paved surfaces and be transported into local waters though the storm drainage system, picking up various pollutants along the way. UTC also reduces the urban heat island effect, reduces heating/cooling costs, lowers air temperatures, reduces air pollution, increases property values, provides wildlife habitat, and provides aesthetic and community benefits such as improved quality of life.

Urban Bush land Council’s Mary Gray agreed that more trees were needed in metropolitan areas,,,

“Unfortunately, they tend to bulldoze the whole landscape instead of looking at what’s there and then building in amongst it.

“It seems crazy to wipe the whole lot out.”

Killing the Great Australian Dream – Limit urban sprawl, says Freo mayor Brad Pettit – The West Australian

 

 

%d bloggers like this: