Amazing similarities between Barnett and Pettitts policy and agenda,,,,,, Speak with your feet | Fremantle Herald Interactive

Amazing similarities between Barnett and Pettitts agenda, controlling how you live

Barnett’s laws are part of a growing trend of legislation that undermines civil rights.

Source: Speak with your feet | Fremantle Herald Interactive

Amazing that the greens candidate brings up this issue, well not really hypocrisy could be considered policy for many of them? anyway while the greens candidate for Fremantle is complaining against a bill to become law that stops protesters from interfering with people going about their lawful activity. Its not against protesting its self, just about protesters interfering with other peoples lawful activity. Seems reasonable to me.

Anyway while she is protesting and writing about Barnett’s interfering with peoples rights, her green party members on council are doing the same thing with how people live. Our Mayor in Freo Brad Pettitt wants to limit the size of the house you can build on your own block, while he is driving sub-division at the same time hes got other plans up his sleeve that will effect your family rights in Fremantle.

 

Things like one car per house, banning street and verge parking encouraging development in town with out adequate if parking? What effect will this have on your investment? When streets are packed with people cars who’s apartments don’t have a car parking space. Long term it will have a negative impact on growth for these properties, especially when every where else is ensuring adequate parking space. This is WA a state bigger than western europe.

So while the greens candidates is complaining about a law that will really only effect the professional protesters and their activities to stop businesses going about their lawful activity, the Mayors Plan will impact how your family life at home 24/7, 365 days a year.

Now that’s worth protesting about.

 

Groups demand square rethink | Fremantle Herald Interactive, Plus a Little WA Inc?

ABOUT 170 members of three Fremantle community organisations met Wednesday evening, calling on the council to rethink its Kings Square plans. Following a presentation by commercial adviser Martin L…

Source: Groups demand square rethink | Fremantle Herald Interactive

 

 The arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed, lest Rome fall.” Marcus Tullius Cicero

 

Great to see community groups getting together to ensure the best of our city.

Over 2 years the council has repeatedly not answered the questions and hides behind hidden document secret meetings.

How we see this in yesterdays herald.

KINGS SQUARE DEAL ‘FREO INC’?

http://www.fremantleherald.com/fremantle.pdf

http://www.fremantleherald.com/

Chapter Three: W.A. Inc.: Why Didn’t We Hear The Alarm Bells?

Premier is quoted as it smells like WA Inc., when further questioned, doesn’t deny but give a “no comment”
That tells story’s by its self.
I wonder if they would risk moving a government department to a place where there is such controversy and community concerns.

They have a government election around the corner supporting a council led project that has potential blow MILLIONS of $$$$$$$$ of rate payers, money??

Why does the Mayor push so hard for the Sirona deal to go through surely if they come to Freo anywhere is a bonus???

What does the Fremantles Mayor Brad Pettitt have to gain driving this one deal, that risks so much of Fremantles financial future??
Is it just ego?
We have seen a past mayor call it lunacy.
A sitting Premier compare it with WA Inc.
Two financial specialists working in in big business question the basic business financial soundness of the citys Business Plan.
# community groups that have run multiple community events to inform the residents and rate Payers.
Questions asked in Parliament about it.
Hidden documents by council
Secret meetings
Public attacks on a resident for raising questions on the Business plan.
A minister for local government refusing to investigate, whats he afraid he will find?
A new independent Councillor just entering the council voted against, Brads plan
All this and the Brad train just blunders on clearly he could not care less about about public concerns the very people they was swore to represent.

When questions are raised on the Mayors blog it been claimed edits or deletes them, bloggers have to post to other sites, only then it seems the Mayor will post the questions, while never answering whats asked but spinning to another angle. I have had similar issues in the past myself, others now coming out with the same claims. Its why i stopped reading it, just another promo blog.

Non of this seems very Mayoral

 

Chalk and Cheese over Perth Freight Link

What a well-run meeting by the North Fremantle Community great job by Gerry MacGill, a nice civil community Q&A. Well done to the crowd that attended too.

But Whoa what a difference a couple of weeks makes. I went to the Victoria Hall meeting with Peter Newman as the headline name for the night, all on the Perth Freight Link (PFL). Last night I went to the Nth Fremantle community meeting on the PFL impact especially focused on Nth Freo. Here Peter Newman was again a headline draw card with the Premier Colin Barnett giving the governments opinion, as the local member. But the sting was really not in his presentation in Nth Freo as it was in Victoria Hall. Side note at vic hall when the council wants a crowd they put one buffet, no need at Nth Freo.

Great to see the Premier make time to speak to his electorate.

What surprised me was the whole CUSP report was all front and centre at Victoria Hall, the Mayor sprouting its contents and not surprising as it cost the rate payers $20,000. At Nth Freo it barely rated a mention, Peter Newman spent as much time talking about his new book as he did the CUSP report that our council dropped $20 k on.

In fact I think the City of Kwinana’s new Indian Ocean Gateway document got more attention than the CUSP report, that Fremantle council paid $20,000 for. Good to see at least one council driving for investment, jobs, infrastructure and developments in the city, well done Kniwana.

So I wonder what we the rate payer paid for in the CUSP report as I expected  Prof Newman would be using it to give the Premier both barrels, instead they spent the most of the night agreeing with each other. Peter Newman put forward of course the inter-nodal issue which I believe various governments have been talking about for years with Lat 32.

Peter Newman could not even definitely say the Roe 8 was not needed for the outer harbour system as it’s in the plans for the Lat 32.

His point was the Roe 8 went to the wrong port, which sounds like an endorsement for the Roe 8 to be built. Yet he no solution for Fremantle’s coming years of traffic issues as the current ports needs to operate for at least the next 20-30 years till it gets to the cap and transition that Peter and Colin agreed on. Quite a surprise from the Victoria Hall presentation? It was agreed by both speakers that Fremantle’s Port could double in container volume over the next 10 years to about 1.4 million containers, yet Peter Newman had no solution for how to handle the increase of containers Fremantle will have until the Outer Harbour is finally operational.

So one question that needs answering is that if PFL is not built, what is the container solution for Fremantle as even Peter Newman believes the maximum achievable container on rail will be just over 30%. Leaving 70% of container movements to go by truck.

Good to see someone bring up the emission control regulations from Euro 5&6 for diesel engines and Peter Newman admitted that truck emissions dropped drastically over the years with new technology and believed that trucks would go to gas over the coming years removing the diesel emission issue.  California is also moving into trucks running on Hydrogen also cutting out truck emissions as an issue. We could also bring in the 80/20 diesel blends which would have an immediate reduction on emissions.

Strangely the Mayor was very quiet at the meeting not even a question?

It was also interesting to see the 2 speakers agree that WA was the best performer for freight on rail and they both agreed, even if the Outer Harbour is built without massive investment in the inter-nodal systems the rail volume would still not increase much past 30% which is the current target of the Inner Harbour.

It was good to see the Premier so clearly state the Roe 9 part is still under evaluation and needs lots of work before the final route is chosen. While good that the decision will get public debate, sucks for those who live on the proposed routes as they will be left hanging in limbo till a decision is made.

I think the argument that the Roe 8 will bring more trucks to Fremantle is done, it’s only more containers that will bring more trucks to fremantle, which will still come whether PFL is built or not.  Something needs to be built to handle the next decades of increasing trucks to the Port and the ever increasing smaller vehicles on the road around Fremantle.

Our council has blindly followed the Barnett governments in fill plan while not getting any infrastructure to handle the increased density, population and the cars they bring. Last night the Premier said about 90% of houses have 1 car and over 50% have two. I think those figures are from a census some time back as I drive around my suburb the number of cars in front of one house is more than that. Just think our Mayor Brad has 2 cars himself.

Time for council to stand up for our amenity and tell the government no more infill or density increases till we start to see the necessary infrastructure to deal with it, PT or better roads I don’t mind which I just want to see some guarantees of delivery. Of course that also means when the government tries to put some in place it helps for the council not to say no.

So I go back to my “Thinking Allowed OPEN MINDS” where I called for public debate on this issue. If the 2nd leg of PFL Roe 9 goes ahead, now is the time for people to say what we need from this road/tunnel, to make our suburbs more livable,  as truck free and safe as we can make it.

 

 

Premier takes passenger s seat – The West Australian

Premier Colin Barnett joins State Political Editor Gareth Parker to discuss issues concerning WA voters.

Source: Premier takes passenger s seat – The West Australian

Here is the bit I’m sure interests all the locals on the PFL.

The section on the light rail is interesting as well.

PERTH FREIGHT LINK

GP: One of the issues that a lot of people wanted to talk about on our Facebook pages and on Twitter is the Perth Freight Link. It’s a very expensive project, it’s a very contentious project. Why are you going ahead with it?
CB: Perth is quite a unique city. We have a population of just under 2 million, but Perth is also a major trading point. We don’t have much manufacturing industry scattered around the suburbs of Perth, and yet we’ve got huge mining, petroleum and agricultural industries. So we’ll always have large amounts of heavy transport, chemicals transport, agricultrual produce, minerals, coming out of rail systems and the like. That makes us a little bit different, our ports are very important. The project, I think, should be looked at in two stages. The first stage is Roe 8, which is taking (traffic) from the (Kwinana) Freeway through to Stock Road. Now, whatever the future of the port may be, Roe 8 is needed, both to service the Fremantle Port and a future port at Cockburn.

GP: Do you say that Roe 8 could take traffic south as well as north (from Stock Road?)
CB: Wherever the port goes, you need Roe 8. So Roe 8 will be the first stage and a lot of work has done into that, its design, environmental approvals, it really is ready to go. We think work will probably start next year on Roe 8. The second component is getting heavy vehicles, not only through Roe 8, but into the port. There are all sorts of issues there, because we’re going through established residential areas. So the design work is not yet complete. A fair bit of work needs to happen on that. We do need to have a better access into Fremantle. Fremantle will continue to grow as a port for another 15 years, then it will continue (as a working port). It’s not going to close. There seems to be a view that Fremantle is going to close. It won’t. It will reach its capacity then continue to operate at that capacity. In about 15 years time you will start to see extra port facilities develop in Cockburn. It won’t be as big as Fremantle initially, but by 2030 maybe it will become the main port. So at that stage, you will also need the access to go to Cockburn.

GP: There’s two main options beyond Roe 8. One is to take it north on Stock Road, then west on Leach Highway and High Street. The other option the Transport Minister is looking at is tunnelling. You’re supposed to award a contract by December. Are you confident you’ll have enough information to be able to pick an option that’s within Budget by December?
CB: No I’m not. I think that’s probably a bit tight.

GP: It will be pushed out?
CB: Well I think we’ve got to get this right. And it is complicated. For the moment, the concentration will be getting Roe 8 underway.

GP: So you’re now saying this is really a two-stage process?
CB: There are two projects. Interconnected, but Roe 8 is the start, get Roe 8 built, then build the connection into Fremantle. So there is a bit of time to sort that out, and there are complex issues, one of which is the choice between different road routes, or tunnelling – a lot of work to be done to investigate that. There is also the issue of how do you get across the Swan River and into North Fremantle and the port facilities.

GP: Indeed, because even if you build the $1.6 billion link, it only takes you to Canning Highway, doesn’t it.
CB: It will get you there, then you need to get across the river. That’s the southern part of my electorate of Cottesloe. I’m very conscious of the issues of getting that tight corner into the Fremantle port area.

GP: So I guess given that uncertainty, and that issue about getting traffic into the port, a lot of people are wondering why you don’t just take the investment, send it further south to service a new road and rail corridor into a new port down at Cockburn.
CB: Well, the new port is probably $4 billion or $5 billion to build. And it’s not needed yet. It will be needed, but probably not for another 15 years. So we’re not going to build a road system to a port that isn’t there.

 

 

Rate Payer Funded Junkets are not just the Rage in Fremantle?

jet polution

Looks like it’s not just Fremantle councillors who refer to rate payer funded overseas trips as Junkets? A link to a letter from last week.

Quote from herald letter “When Melville councillor Susanne Taylor-Rees mentioned the word “junket” in reference to a similar state government trip to Japan, she was ordered to withdraw the word (despite her reliance on the Oxford dictionary’s definition it is a trip funded at public expense).” A BUNCH of councillors and staff from Melville and Cockburn councils are packing their bags for a 10-day tour of Asia and Europe to study waste-to-energy technology. Just don’t call the $6000 per person mystery trip a junket.”

Another letter this week on the same sort of issues?

Burns me up
ANOTHER incinerator junket trip (Herald, March 21, 2015)?
I am outraged to read that Melville and Cockburn ratepayers will be paying to send delegates around the world to look at more waste to energy incinerators.
The previous state government-organised junket trip was only last year and the premier went the year before that. How many is enough?
The Barnett government is bullying councils to support its expensive dirty waste-to-energy incinerator agenda against the best interests of the community, environment and our children’s health.
WA needs a sustainable zero waste strategy, not dirty energy technologies that emit more greenhouse gases than coal and gas, poison our air with dioxins, heavy metals and nanoparticles and destroy many more long-term jobs that come with composting and recycling.
Residual waste can be treated without incineration but the focus really should be on reducing our waste through better education and better recycling and composting infrastructure.
While some south metro communities face private bin audits, we still do not have public place recycling bins meaning this vast volume of public waste will be used to keep the toxic burners viable.
I wonder if delegates will get to meet affected host communities living close to incinerators. Or speak with the European Union which is moving to decommission incinerators in favour of safe, renewable energy technologies like solar and wind as it moves towards a sustainable circular economy? Our state government is selling our children’s future by pursuing this dirty energy industry, however local governments have the power to stop them. But will they?
Jane Bremmer

I don’t know if I agree with the Barnett government bullying councils our Mayor after his Junket to Japan to check out the incinerator seemed to be in favour of it, he certainly didn’t talk out against the incinerators at the rubbish forum I went to? Strangely it’s all quiet on the rubbish front lately, I still haven’t heard anything about our 3 bin trial Brad spoke about that evening?

On the recycling front Fremantle for a so called progressive council can’t even offer garbage separation bins in the CBD? It’s always the basics?

When I lived in Genève in the early 90’s they had a better rubbish separation program than Fremantle has 25yrs later.

http://fremantlereform.com/tag/junket/

money-bag-308983_640

%d bloggers like this: