thumbs down

Fremantle residents and rate payers disapproval of council

After I read Roels Freo view article, FREO COMMUNITY HAPPIER WITH COUNCIL,  I thought I would check out the report on the Fremantle’s City website.

On 1st review it looks ok, I start to think, hey I’m way off base with my opinion of the council, in what the rate payers and residences think. Crap, oh well I had better take my medicine and see what issues I’m so off base on. So I download the attached reports made by CATALYSE® Community Perceptions Survey  

Good news is the Herald was ranked as the best Source of information about what’s happening locally, well done Herald

Once you start reading the report and taking into consideration the data inside, it paints a completely different picture of what I read on the city’s site and Roels page. Which is pretty much a cut and paste of the city’s PR page, where they tried to make lemonade from raw onion juice. No criticism of that I cut and paste myself all the time. The real issue is the city page excerpt is completely misleading, while it makes it sound that things are on the up and moving forward, its the reading of the details that paints the real picture and moving up from where and when is one of the questions to ask?

There are several parameters to look at before you worry about the actual issues.

One is the date for studies taken, if you compare the 2005 data with data reported from 2015 survey, you will find that most of the community responses are far worse now, than the data taken from 10 years ago, hence in the last decade Fremantle on most fronts, is worse off than 10 years ago. Not a good look for our Mayor Brad Pettitt, isn’t this his 10 year anniversary for being on council?

Another is the comparison to similar or like councils in regards to best practice or the average result across the board. So here is the kicker while on things like festival most other councils don’t seem to rate, Fremantle comes out on top. While on most of the issues that directly effect residents and rate payers, Fremantles gets the worse scores, a bit concerning when this is the city we live in.

A few facts from the report out of the 25 councils that where surveyed Fremantle was ranked 18th

Overall performance compared to other councils

  • Industry high or benchmark 67%
  • Industry average 52%
  • Fremantle  overall 43%

Overall satisfaction with City of Fremantle as a place to live, down from 2012 with no records reported before 2012.

Economic development and job creation down from the 2005 score of 72, to the 2015 of 40, a huge 32 point drop.

If you take all the heading or categories of the “City of Fremantle Community Perceptions 2015” report/survey and count up the categories that use the headings

  • Benchmarking ( a couple of categories were not counted at other councils)
  • Level of satisfaction
  • History (Some history does not go back 10yrs)

Number of categories was about 37, Freo was average in 6 of them below average in 31. (in comparisons to other councils in WA)

7 where had no data doing back to 2005. In 7 of the categories, Fremantle was ahead of its 2005 score and in a couple the same. 20+ where below the 2005 standard. Making in general Fremantle  far worse than it was back in 2005 according to the feedback. In a decade the survey shows a clear decline in real standards, while we have a loss of services and some of the highest rate increases in the metro area.

Hold on, think for a second, what do you think the 4 worse areas for concern were for Fremantle residents and rate payers,

  • Economic Development and Job Creation
  • How the City Centre is being developed
  • Parking in the City Centre
  • Graffiti, vandalism and anti-social behaviour

No surprise there right.

Now when you look at what the city has promoted on its website

Some of the key areas of improvement (based on levels of community satisfaction) are:

  • overall satisfaction with the City as a governing organisation  – up 7% * up 7% from last report but no data recorded prior, seems strange
  • council’s leadership – up 9% * When I read the report from Council’s leadership within the community its actually down 9 pts from 2005
  • youth services and facilities – up 21% *Actually only up 19 pts from 2005 but a good increase all the same
  • openness and transparency – up 9% *Again I don’t see where this came from as I see it’s down 7pts from 2005, even it they use 2012 its only 7
  • value for money (rates) – up 11% *No figure from 2005 though still down 5 pts from the 2008 report
  • parks and other green spaces – up 9% *Actually down 3 pts from 2005
  • family services and facilities –  up 13% *Actually up 1 pt from 2005 not 13pts
  • access for people with disabilities – up 10%* Actually down 8 pts from 2005, this is really poor if the city did a better job in early 2000
  • conservation and environmental management – up 12%*Actually up 3 pts from 2005, really poor considering how much councillors talk about this issue
  • planning and building approvals – up 8%*Actually down 7pts from 2005 sending a really clear message to community and business
  • parking in the city centre – up 8%.*Seriously parking is better? Please, actually down 15pts from 2005

Its pretty disingenuous to claim things have gotten better when you are actually down from a true point of view from when reports/surveys started. Your standards should be set on the best achieved not benchmarking off the fact that you have run it into the ground and claim a small bounce up as an achievement, when it is well below where you started.

A quick comparison of  this council in reference to the 2005 benchmark shows they made Fremantle a worse place even the overall satisfaction with City of Fremantle as a place to live has come down 2 pts since the last survey in 2012, with no data shown before this I wonder why?

Then again we don’t really need to read the report, a quick read of the paper or walk through town tells us the story. If they want to actually make things better its only done by taking a good honest look at the real situation, not with heavily rose tinted glasses.

Don’t take my word for it, top of the page is a link to the report, have a read and decide for yourself .

rose tinted glasses

Sometimes we go around deceiving ourselves into thinking things are a lot better than they actually are.

Vandal or artist? | Fremantle Herald Interactive

Source: Vandal or artist? | Fremantle Herald Interactive

Interesting discussion, from an art point of view but graffiti is not an artistic point of view but a point of law.

If you have permission to place a drawing, mural, scratching etc, its all cool, if you don’t have permission then its vandalism which is a crime.

The fact that Fremantle council is finally joining reality has to be a good thing.

As comments by the mayor in the past have left Fremantle as a magnet for criminal vandals, taggers, etc, but encouraging graffiti by referring to it as art or looking for artistic merit, which gave Fremantle a dirty slum look in parts. Its not a good look for tourists and visitors to our city. Its also not a great attractor for investors or new business.

“The Sunday Times can reveal WA Police wrote to Fremantle Mayor Brad Pettitt urging the council to reconsider its decision to no longer remove graffiti from public buildings if it is deemed to be art.

Instead, council officers will send photographs of the graffiti to the city’s public art advisory group to determine whether it should stay. Though the move has been welcomed by local artists, police complain it contradicts the State Government’s graffiti policy.

“Criminals will be drawn to the area,” the letter from the WA Police Community Engagement Division warned. “We know that 73 per cent of those apprehended in police operations … are engaging in other more serious offending behaviours, which will essentially encourage other crimes in the area.”

Police said it would also result in more damage on buses and trains, posed a risk to surrounding councils and would damage the port city’s tourism.”

Another great decision by our Mayor, well done. Its just poor policy followed by worse then 1/2 arsed attempts to fix the damage its caused. This has to be the worse decade Fremantle business and retail has ever seen?

Vandals have actually been reported by police to have said, that graffiti was ok in Fremantle as the mayor encouraged it.

The idea of saying vandalism has an artistic merit has to be considered an act of insanity, who is a local government to say its ok for some idiot to spray your house, fence, home, business, etc,  because some fools on the council thinks it has artistic merit, please give me a break.

FREMANTLE Council is set to defy a police warning that its new graffiti-friendly policy will make the port city a haven for criminal activity.

If someone chooses to have their property sprayed , painted, drawn on etc, while i may not like it, its not graffiti as they had permission to do it, which is the main point.

The heading for the story Vandalism or Art is just a distraction as the only point is permission or not, legal or not.

What is disturbing is the councils direction that goes against state law. Now we see more and more stupid positions taken by council are now being changed, to directions of common sense.

The Mayors idea to invite street begging in Freo, then months later once common sense comes home a tightening of laws, and restricting them. The same for inviting the homeless to Freos CBD, something Perth was stopping but our Mayor invites in only to change direction later, graffiti another poor decision to later rectified. The loss of Myers also no concern for our Mayor as he embraces bohemian quirky retail only later to admit that Fremantle needs quality retailers. Its just a litany of mistakes and back tracking on poor choices, causing years of damage to Fremantle’s retail sector, just seconds of common sense thought would have foretold the disaster coming. One step forward, 5 backwards.

Anti social behavior is killing CDB business we have seen in the past retailers state this, just yesterday I had friends tell me of sitting in the CBD area having street beggars harassing them for money in the la fresco dining area, then going into the cafe to harass diners for money only to have a mouthful of abuse for not handing over the cash.  As it stands I believe we have more small businesses to leave Freo due to poor poor traffic and anti-social issues, both going hand in hand.

Now we see commissioned pieces of work down at the old navy stores vandalized, much harder to fix than a plain painted wall.

Fremantle will not have its renaissance of business without sorting out its anti-social issues, sadly these issues go hand in hand with our current council, that fails in will to rectify these issues. They are the ones who encouraged graffiti, vagrancy and anti-social behaviour, all having a negative impact on retail and business in Fremantle.

Homelessness is a serious issue and our state and federal governments need to do a better job addressing these community issues. Its not our councils job to attract these issues to our city and leave retail, business and residents to deal with the repercussions.





%d bloggers like this: