MELVILLE Mayor Russell Aubrey has criticised the City of Cockburn for backing a $290 million road project to unlock traffic in Perth’s south-east
Source: Mayors exchange words
Good to see both Mayors of Melville and Cockburn driving development that will make their own citys, less congested, more efficient, more productive, safer, better for emplyment etc.
The ALP seem to have no issues building new roads, with great promises to Armadale and Cockburn.
I hope they have a big budget as Metronet and the Outer Harbour looks like costing them 10 billions on just to projects. I wonder if that leaves any money for the Freo area or are we due to miss out again on any state funds.
Cockburn is driving for new roads and connections to keep their area, driving forward with development. Of course they want the Outer Harbour to develop and possibly more importantly the Lat 32 giving the area a huge boost in revenue, developments and jobs.
Seems that both Roe 8 and the outer harbour will have environmental impacts.
Back to Freo with all the chat on the various issues and views, if Roe 8 and Roe 9 don’t go ahead what will be done for Freo in the 10-15 years to fix the growing car traffic and of course the every expanding Port.
Considering at the last meeting I saw with the Premier and Peter Newman they seem to agree that the while Fremantle port already has best practice in Australia for Rail use, it would not be possible to expand containers to Rail much past 30% which is the current target. The also both agree Fremantle Port will continue to operate and with cap and transitions (once the outer Harbour opens) will see the port grow in containers movements over the next 15 years at least.
So the question stands what will happen to improve Fremantle’s every worsening traffic situation? I still haven’t heard a solutions just objections.
In my reading i found this doc below which had some interesting reading in.
On pg 11 (of the above link) shows some of the environmental studies/info which shoulders right to the Lat 32 area.?